THE property buying frenzy has cooled down, but elements
of a bubble brewing are very much intact.
So far, none of the major property projects have been
shelved or delayed in Kuala Lumpur and Johor Baru, suggesting that developers
are confident of a successful take-up despite statistics showing that there is
a slowdown in demand.
According to Bank Negara,
the evidence of a slowdown in the property market is obvious, backing the claim
with statistics.
It says the Malaysian House Price Index has declined to
9.6% in the fourth quarter of 2013, the first time it has dipped below 10%
since the third quarter of 2011. The dip was recorded across most states and
most dwellings.
Sales and new property launches slowed towards the end of
last year, while borrowers with three or more outstanding housing loans
declined to about 4% from a peak of 15.8% before the implementation of the
macro-prudential measures to cool down the property market in 2010.
According to the central bank, borrowers with three or
more property loans outstanding account for only 3% of total borrowers, and
some 84% of housing loan borrowers have only one outstanding loan.
Banks are also seeing an improvement in their buffer
against any possible slide in property prices, as the proportion of outstanding
housing loans with a loan-to-value ratio of above 70% had declined to 46.6%
towards the end of last year compared with 50.1% in 2012.
However, a slowing property market is not equivalent to it
not being a danger to the financial system.
The signs of slowing down are there due to the
macro-prudential measures that have been put in place since 2010.
A severe blow came about during the budget last year when
the Government imposed a 30% real property gains tax (RPGT) on property sold
within the first three years of purchase.
This effectively quelled speculation to a large degree.
The 30% RPGT ruling effectively shaved off the profit margins of those wanting
to offload the property as soon as they received the keys.
However, what's perplexing is that while the
macro-prudential measures seem to have an impact, there does not seem to be any
stopping the over-building situation in Kuala Lumpur and Johor Baru.
In the city, the continued building of commercial space is
a cause for concern, while in Johor Baru, the massive launches of apartments by
developers from China have gotten even government agencies worried.
What's worse is that the bulk of the over-building of
commercial space in the city is coming from government-owned developers.
The Tun Razak Exchange (TRX), a project by the government-sponsored 1Malaysia Development Bhd, is going ahead, thanks to
the cheap land it managed to get on a silver platter.
According to property consultants, the first phase of
development is slated to kick off with some six million square feet of
commercial space coming into the market over the next four to five years.
This is bigger than the commercial space that came into
the market from the KLCC project in the late 1990s.
The TRX project is a 15-year development, and eventually,
some 30 million square feet of commercial space will be coming into the market.
This is based on the present planning approvals. As the years progress, the
authorities may get generous with plot ratios, allowing for more building of
commercial space.
Apart from the TRX, there is also the 100-storey Menara
Warisan that is being built by Permodalan
Nasional Bhd, and the Bandar Malaysia project that is being planned on
the 495 acres that presently house the air force base in Sungai Besi, Kuala
Lumpur.
Over in the south, Johor Baru is expected to see a massive
supply of commercial and residential space in the next few years, with the
carpet-bombing style of development undertaken by the big guys from China.
Country Garden Holdings Ltd launched 9,000 units of apartments one to two years
ago and sold 6,000 units. So far, there is little news on whether the rest of
the units have been taken up.
Country Garden is the first of the developers from China
to flock to Johor Baru. Many more are coming, with one developer said to be
looking at launching some 30,000 units of apartments in Johor Baru.
Existing developers in Johor Baru and Iskandar Malaysia are worried, with good reason
too.
It has prompted a government strategic investment arm to
undertake a study, which revealed that the number of apartments and commercial
space coming into Johor Baru in the next few years is 30 times that of Mont
Kiara.
Obviously, the macro-prudential measures have not stopped
developers from building.
The macro-prudential measures taken by the Government and
Bank Negara are only measures to delay a property bubble. They help to reduce
the overwhelming optimism and prop-up demand when the overall environment is
sober. It helps smoothen out the boom-to-bust cycle.
Such measures have been taken by central banks from Asia
in the last four years to help reduce speculative demand and over-building.
However, questions remain on how effective these measures
are in curbing property bubbles.
Many a time, developers and speculators exploit loopholes
in the system. For instance, the Government had put in measures earlier this
year to stop developers from offering retail buyers with schemes that allow
them to reduce their down-payments for purchases.
But it was not effective because speculators had
established property clubs to buy property in bulk and circumvent the ruling.
The ruling on a 30% RPGT for the first three years of
disposal that came into effect at the beginning of this year has had an impact.
But for how long it will be effective remains to be seen.
Over the last four years, central bankers all over the
world have been grappling with containing the asset inflation due to ample
liquidity without having to raise interest rates.
They have been able to cool off demand on a short-term
basis. But the over-building persists and is fuelling a property bubble.
This suggests that
macro-prudential measures are no replacement for conventional tools such as
tightening monetary policy to curb speculation.